英文摘要 |
The addition of the crime of sexual assault by persons with care responsibilities does not increase the age of sexual consent, and the legal interest protected by the crime is still the right of sexual self-determination. Specifically, since Article 236-1 of the Criminal Law does not reflect any mandatory color, it should be interpreted as 'the perpetrator uses non-mandatory words to induce women aged 14 to 16 to have sexual relations with them'. The protection of legal interests in this crime should be positioned as the right to self-determination without being lured, and its theoretical basis lies in the information difference and trust risk between subjects. Based on the theory of 'the right to self-determination without being deceived', the non-mandatory behavior of this crime is not dangerous, and the allocation of legal punishment with reprieve of this crime can be reasonably interpreted. At the same time, based on the theory of ' the right to self-determination without being deceived', this crime follows the progressive judgment approach in the identification and conviction judgment, which can not only avoid mixing thiscrime with the crime of rape, will not affect the legitimate application of felony, but also reserve a reasonable space for conviction. In terms of systematization, this crime, as a relatively mild and nonmandatory crime, establishes a dual pattern of the coexistence of mandatory (no consent) and non - mandatory (no genuine consent) in sexual crimes, thus highlighting the independent significance of this crime. |