英文摘要 |
After the end of World War II, a large number of international adoptions began to take place, but the early international adoption practices of various countries did not provide sufficient protection measures for the adoptees, their biological parents and adopters, resulting in the abuse of international adoption, which was “trading children in the name of adoption”. In order to prevent this abuse, the Hague Conference on Private International Law adopted the “Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption” in 1993, which has been successfully acceded to by many countries and has become an international standard for the legal regulation of international adoption. Although Taiwan is a fairly developed country, recent statistics show that the number of children adopted by foreigners in Taiwan still accounts for a significant proportion of all adoption cases. In the past, Taiwan's legal system did not specifically regulate or control international adoptions, except for the rules on the applicable law. However, in recent years, legislators have begun to establish special regulations for international adoptions, and there is an urgent need to examine whether these regulations and international adoption practices comply with the international standards of the Hague Adoption Convention. In addition, there has been an increase in the number of international adoptions by step-parents of children born before the marriage between a Taiwanese man and a foreign woman (mainly a Southeast Asian woman). The two types of international adoptions mentioned above are different in terms of the court practice and need to be examined separately. In view of this, this article first briefly introduces the main framework of the Hague Adoption Convention; then analyzes the international adoption-related legal norms introduced in Taiwan in recent years and the statistics published by the competent authorities; then reviews the appropriateness of the choice of law rule on the establishment of international adoption under Article 54 (1) of the Act Governing the Choice of Law in Civil Matters Involving Foreign Elements, and analyzes how to interpret this provision, and then conducts a comprehensive study on the important issues in court practice. |