英文摘要 |
“The Financial Asset Securitization Act”and“the Real EstateSecuritization Act”codify the law regarding launching procedures, structuresand participants of asset securitization, establishing the rules for the relevantparties to comply with. However, as elaborated by this research, constantinnovation in the field of financial engineering has meant asset securitizationproducts evolved into very complicated schemes. For instance, will rules aboutinformation disclosure and conflict of interests be able to protect investors?What will the actual influence of these rules be? Is the rating agency reallyfunctional?Moreover, how do we design the method to protect investors? By takingthe subprime mortgage crisis in U.S.A. and the structured notes of LehmanBrothers as examples, we examine Taiwan’s regulations and test whether wecan improve our system. As for the asset securitization and the protection ofinvestors; it is crucial that we reduce the benefits and conflicts of ratingagencies and strengthen penalty mechanisms. Further in regard to penalties, theinvestors might be able to apply Article 20 and 32 of the Securitization Act inR.O.C. , to request compensation from those rating agencies that produce falseor unreal rating reports, such as the intent, negligent requirements or theassumptions of causality, for balancing the market rules and the fairness.Last but not least, regarding the consignment of obligations and rights,there are some systems to make public notifications by using the electricapplication system, to disclose to the public the forms of the obligations andrights, to improve the activities of securitization.This research focuses on how to protect investors through the frameworkof securitization. It is hoped that there can be some contribution to academia aswell as to the market. |