破壞野生動物資源犯罪的法益考量與重構

Legal Benefit Consideration and Reconstruction of the Crime of Destroying Wild Animal Resources

破壞野生動物資源犯罪的保護法益是雙層法益，即阻擋層法益與背後層法益，二者是手段與目的之關系。野生動物管理秩序是阻擋層法益，人類中心法益論、生態中心法益論以及二元折中法益論都是在西方''主客二元''思維范式下二元利益法益觀的框架內對阻擋層法益作循環解釋，導致司法實踐中面臨人類利益與該類犯罪核心法益抵牾時利益衡量失靈之情況頻發。因此，提倡與發展基于中華傳統生態環境法文化基本思想的創造性轉化下形成的一體關系法益觀，在此基礎上結合雙層法益結構塑造雙層秩序法益論，主張背後層法益是生態秩序即人與野生動物的和諧共生關系，能克服既有學說在解釋論上的缺陷，指導規範適用，規避利益衡量失靈。

"The crime of destroying wildlife resources protects two layers of legal benefit. The relationship between the legal benefit of the barrier layer and the legal benefit of the back layer is the relationship between means and purpose. The management order of wildlife resources belongs to the barrier layer of legal benefit. Regardless of the human-centered legal benefit theory, the ecological center legal benefit theory, or the dual eclectic legal benefit theory, within the framework of the view of two-dimension interest legal benefit under the Western thinking paradigm of binary opposition between subject and object, the legal benefit of the barrier layer is explained in a circular manner. As a result, when human interests conflict with the core legal benefit of this type of crime in judicial practice, there are frequent failures of interest measurement. Therefore, it is advocated and developed to make creative transformation of the value concept of the basic thought of the traditional ecological environment legal culture in China into a legal benefit concept. On this basis, combined with the double-layer legal benefit structure, the double-order legal benefit theory is formed. It advocates that the back layer legal benefit is the ecological order, that is, the harmonious symbiosis between humans and wild animals. This proposition can not only effectively overcome the deficiencies of the existing theories in interpretation theory, but also guide the application of norms to avoid the failure of interest measurement."