個人信息司法保護的舉證責任問題

On the Burden of Proof of Judicial Protection of Personal Information

電子商務如火如茶發展的過程中，商業運營者對消費者的個人資訊肩負著重要的資訊安全保護義務，就此產生個人資訊糾紛之時，自然人和企業之間舉證責任的劃分以及證明標準和路徑深刻影響著個人資訊保護案件的裁判結果，即舉證責任分配是個人資訊司法保護中的核心問題，且在目前的司法實踐個案中存在顯著差異。我國新近通過的《個人資訊保護法》建立了統一的個人資訊保護制度，明確了個人資訊處理者“證明自己沒有過錯”的義務。本文通過案例分析及比較研究為相關立法和司法實踐提供參考，同時為完善我國個人資訊保護制度提出建議。

In the process of rapid development of e-commerce, Commercial Operators are responsible for Consumers' personal information security. The allocation of the burden of proof between natural persons and enterprises, as well as the standard and path of proof profoundly affects the judgment results in personal information protection cases, that is, the allocation of the burden of proof is the key point in the judicial protection of personal information, and there are significant differences in the related cases. The ''Personal Information Protection Law'' that is newly enacted establishes a unified personal information protection system and clarifies the obligation of data processors to ''prove that they are not at fault'' . This article aims to provide a reference for burden of proof through specific cases and comparison of foreign laws and give suggestions for improving the protection of personal information in our country.