英文摘要 |
This study is focused on the copyright ownership of in-job-service of elementary and secondary school teachers. This article intends to clarify the concept of the principle and exception of writers (owners), the differences between commissioned work and employment work, and the work within the scope of employment or not. In the meantime, this article tries to analyze the actual verdict from the court in order to clarify reasonable range on work in job positions and set a reasonable norm for the ownership of the copyrights of teachers’ work. According to the regulations of the revised Copyright Act in 1998, the ownership of teachers’ work finished in their job positions basically belongs to schools. However, the viewpoint of this article is that the scope of work in job positions should be defined by the “standard job behavior of a good administrator” and “regulations of contracts and law” and other dispute between the above definition, the economic rights of work should be attributed to teachers. Furthermore, weather teachers use school resources or service hours to create their work should not be considered as the standard of defining the ownership of copyrights. This article intends to give the following suggestions: to promote the judgment of the ownership of copyrights through clarification of contracts and the regulations of law; the characteristics of teacher’s positions and the copyrights favorable to teachers should be considered; when making the regulations of law and defining the copyrights, the promotion of developing education should be also considered. |