認同或是除魅：張我軍「新文學」理論的破與立

Identification or Disenchantment: The Breaking and Establishment of Zhang Wojun's''New Literature''Theory

張我軍在台灣新文學運動的位置，在當代也有著分向的詮釋，一則認為張我軍運用五四運動的思辨方式，其實是想建構一個與中國新文學發展同源相承的脈絡；另一種思考則認為張我軍是為了透過破除中國舊文化的遺毒，建立台灣文學以至於台灣的主體論述，這兩種對於張我軍破格行動的詮釋，也正好代表著台灣兩種政治觀點的對立面。更有趣的是《張我軍全集》的竟是先由北京編輯出版，再由台灣人間出版社以繁體漢字重排出版，這種種的現象似乎都指涉著張我軍發起的「台灣新文學運動」本身就是一個相當複雜的命題，牽涉到非常多的面向，甚至於對於當代的台灣文學史詮釋，都產生了不同立場的詮釋。本文想回到1920－30年代的台灣文學界，希望透過張我軍詩文論述的重新檢視，去深究並爬梳上述問題的本質與緣由，更重要的是一方面進行系統性對於張我軍「新聞學」理論的分析，深入探討他當時針對「舊文學」大破，對於「新文學」大立的「內在隱喻」到底是什麼？他是否有更多層次的目的性與針對性？這種種問題，都必須重新進行檢視，或許才能還原或重構「台灣新文學運動」的意義與價值。

Zhang Wojun's position in Taiwan's New Literature Movement also has a divergent interpretation in the contemporary era. One thinks that Zhang Wujun's use of the May 4th Movement's speculative approach is actually intended to build a context that is consistent with the development of Chinese new literature; Another way of thinking is that Zhang Wojun aims to establish the Taiwanese literature and even Taiwan's main dissertation by destroying the legacy of Chinese old culture. These two interpretations of Zhang Wojun's extraordinary actions also represent Taiwan's two political views. opposite. What's more interesting is that ''The Complete Works of Zhang Wojun'' was first edited and published by Beijing and then reprinted in traditional Chinese characters by the Taiwan Human Press. This phenomenon seems to refer to the ''Taiwan New Literature'' initiated by Zhang Wojun. ''Movement'' itself is a rather complicated proposition, involving a lot of aspects, and even interpretations of contemporary Taiwan literature history have produced interpretations of different positions. This article wants to go back to the Taiwanese literary circle in the 1920s and 30s. I hope to re-examine and comb through the nature and causes of the above problems through a re-examination of Zhang Wojun's poems. The analysis of the theory of ''learning'', in-depth discussion of what was the ''inner metaphor'' of the ''old literature'' that was broken at that time. Does he have more levels of purpose and pertinence? All these problems must be re-examined, and perhaps the meaning and value of the ''Taiwan New Literature Movement'' can be restored or reconstructed.