英文摘要 |
The well-known American journal Foreign Policy once ranked the parliaments of Taiwan, Japan, and Belgium as among the most ineffectual worldwide. The reasons for the lethargy of Taiwan's parliament include, but are not limited to, the following: an ambiguous constitutional system, low level of authority of the Speaker, and the violent actions of the members of parliament. Taiwan's parliament, the Legislative Yuan, is the highest level centrally elected representative institution of the country. It aims to create and monitor a legal system to guide executive agencies in administration. Its performance over the last few decades has, however, been disappointing. The quality and efficiency of legislation remains unsatisfactory, while the members of parliament themselves continue to deal with personal and public matters inappropriately. In order to improve Taiwan's parliamentary functions, it is worth considering constitutional reforms, such as constitutional reform, the enhancement of the legal status of the Speaker's police powers, the establishment of an expulsion system for members of parliament, a restructuring of the election system for members of parliament, and proactive steps in the execution of policies, such as the Five Laws of Parliament. This paper explores the abovementioned problems from the perspective of legal institutions and presents specific policy-making suggestions for parliamentary reform. |