英文摘要 |
Crowdfunding is one of the conduits for start-up team to obtain capital, low-cost marketing and test consumer preferences in recent years, but the crowdfunding proposers bear a failure rate of up to 50%. Past studies have explored how to raise money successfully on a crowdfunding platform or analyze consumer sponsorship preferences from the consumer side, but few have explored where these failed crowdfunding cases can go. The research interviewed with six sponsors who failed to raise money and went back to market. It explored how those who failed to raise money could reflect on failures, learn new skills and optimize products or services when driven by self-efficacy, adapt operations to environmental needs, and demonstrate strategic actions. This study will help to understand the sensemaking process of the failed crowdfunding and comeback, and provide the view that crowdfunding proponents convert failed experiences into assets rather than liabilities. |