公有建築文化資產活化再利用的公共性探討：以臺港三個不同的個案為例

A Study of Building Adaptive Re-use of Cultural Heritage within Publicity: Three Cases in Taiwan and Hong Kong

文化資產保存一直無法成為全民的共識，主要在面臨都市開發與老舊建築保存之間的衝突，本文以為透過公有文化資產活化再利用，可以為保存帶來加乘的效果。因此，藉由三個臺港舊警署（臺灣臺北北警察署、香港大澳舊警署、赤柱舊警署）再利用的案例，來探討公有文化資產活化再利用公共性的重要課題。公共性一直是文化資產由政策（policy）到實踐（practice）動態過程的核心議題，尤其以公有建築文化資產再利用，既然為「公有」，對於公共性的要求更甚於非公有者。然而公共性針對不同的文化資產對象，以及不同的行動者間，應該有各種不同的因應策略，不論是採取爭辯、質疑、衝突、討論與學習的態度，都是文化資產展現公共性的重要契機。本文並非針對三個案例進行價值評判，而是就其公共性的不足與優點進行補強與分析，希望藉由這些案例，讓我們思考公有文化資產活化再利用的各種可能，但是這必須在我們具備「發展一種融入公民日常生活的、能夠持久進行的公共參與模式」的前提下，這正是本文為何強調公有文化資產公共性的重要原因。

So far, society has been unable to reach a general consensus on the value of the preservation of cultural heritage, mainly due to the conflict between urban development and the preservation of old architecture. Therefore, this paper discusses how cultural heritage can be achieved through adaptive re-use to bring about positive and synergistic effects during the preservation of old architecture. Three examples are given of Old Police Stations in Taiwan and Hong Kong (Taipei, Taiwan, North Police Department along with Hong Kong’s Old Tai O Police Station and Old Stanley Police Station), in which the author explores the important issue of publicity in cultural heritage work, especially that of adaptive re-use. Publicity has been a core issue in the dynamic process of moving from cultural heritage policy to practical planning; however, there should be a variety of coping strategies to deal with different cases of cultural heritage as well as different actions, whether it involves an attitude of debate, questioning , conflict, discussion or open learning, cultural heritage re-use is an important opportunity to engage the public and educate them. This study is not a judgment for the three cases; however, it offers a reinforcement of principles and an analysis of both the lack of publicity and its advantages. To get cultural heritage adaptive re-use projects taken seriously by the public, project leaders have to integrate publicity into their daily lives and continue to participate in local communities as the code of conduct, which is why the most important aim of this study is to emphasize the value of publicity in cultural heritage efforts.