董氏奇穴學術思想的分化

The academic differentiation of Tung's Acupuncture

目的：分析董氏奇穴的學術傳承與分化。材料與方法：蒐集董景昌及其弟子的書籍、訪談、文章，依照史料的性質，比較其可信度，整理其異同。分析結果：源流、診斷學、治療學，弟子們的記載大致相同。董氏奇穴的數量，胡文智新增最多且受到其他人的質疑。董氏奇穴的位置，楊維傑、胡文智皆有調整。楊維傑認為董氏奇穴與十四經絡的關係密切，其他人不同意。王全民收集並公開較多的董景昌醫案。胡文智描述的七十二絕針與三十二解穴受到其他人的質疑。常用的針刺手法，弟子們的記載大致相同，楊維傑、胡文智另有新增特殊手法。理論推演主要由楊維傑、王全民提出。討論與結論：董氏奇穴的學術傳承，可以透過師徒制及文獻記載來追溯。董氏奇穴的學術分化，已經是客觀存在的事實，當我們討論、應用董氏奇穴時，應說明是根據哪一派的觀點。董氏奇穴的傳承與分化，可讓我們反思腧穴歸經的文獻學史。

Purpose: To analyze the academic inheritance and differentiation of Tung's Acupuncture. Materials and methods: Collect books, interviews, and articles of Dr. Ching-Chang Tung and his disciples, compare their credibility according to the nature of historical materials, and sort out their similarities and differences. Result: The history, diagnostics, and therapeutics of the disciples are roughly the same. The number of Tung's Acupuncture's acupoints, Wen-Chih Hu added the most and was questioned by others. Wei-Chieh Young and Wen-Chih Hu both adjusted the position of Tung's Acupuncture's acupoints. Wei-Chieh Young believes that Tung's Acupuncture are closely related to the fourteen meridians, and others disagree. Chuan-Min Wang collected and disclosed more Dr. Ching-Chang Tung's medical records. Wen-Chih Hu's description of 72 Severing Points and 32 Relieving Points was questioned by others. The commonly used acupuncture techniques are roughly the same among the disciples, Wei-Chieh Young and Wen-Chih Hu also added special techniques. The theoretical deduction was mainly put forward by Wei-Chieh Young and Chuan-Min Wang. Discussion and conclusion: The academic inheritance of Tung's Acupuncture can be traced through the mentorship and documentary records. The academic differentiation of Tung's Acupuncture is already an objective fact. When we discuss and apply Tung's Acupuncture, we should explain which school of view it is based on. The inheritance and differentiation of Tung's Acupuncture allows us to reflect on the philological history of the acupoints returning to the meridian.