英文摘要 |
This paper explores the moderating effect of managers' overconfidence on the relationship between competitive strategies and SG&A cost stickiness. A sample of firms listed on the TSE and OTC over the period, between 2009 and 2016, was selected for this study. The empirical results show that companies adopting the differentiation strategy have higher resource adjustment costs and cost stickiness than companies adopting the cost leadership strategy conclusions consistent with prior literature. The findings, in support of our hypothesis, indicate that differentiators with overconfident managers exhibit greater cost stickiness in comparison with cost leaders with overconfident managers. To test our hypothesis in a robust manner, we use different measures as alternative components of the corporate strategy based on prior studies and also consider the correlation between control variables. As a result, the hypothesis was found supported. We contribute to cost management literature by presenting an alternative view to understand how CEOs' personal characteristics influence the relationship between competitive strategies and cost stickiness. |