英文摘要 |
The state's concept of air sovereignty is constantly changing due to the technological breakthrough and evolution of aircraft. The "Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation" is the foundation of modern international aviation rules. It does not only establish the inviolability of national airspace sovereignty, and also facilitate the development of international air transportation. Military aircrafts are the main executors of national air sovereignty, but they are excluded from the application of the Convention because of its nature of being a national aircraft. However, the Convention does not presuppose and regulate situation where flight safety conflicts with national sovereignty. After the Korean Air incident in 1983, the tragedy where a passenger airplane was shot down by a military aircraft made the world realize that even though maintenance of sovereignty is of vital importance, it should not endanger lives on civilian flights. Article 3bis of the Convention has since been amended to establish air rules for military aircraft interceptions. This article investigates several recent cases of international air interception, particularly the difference between expected standards versus actual incidents, and found out the interception standards differ based on type of targets. This is especially obvious when the target is a military aircraft, and where a number of provocative behaviors have been observed frequently. Given the fact that regulation under international law which applies to military aircraft is very much limited, what kind of rules and appropriate interception measures should be taken when facing provocative behavior of Chinese military aircrafts intruding our airspace, will be vitally important for both the pilots and the national security unit. |