英文摘要 |
This paper seeks to blazon the aesthetic affinity between the two Gothic fictions, Ann Radcliff's The Mysteries of Udolpho and Matthew Gregory Lewis's The Monk. The visual and dramatic qualities of the Gothic fiction have been ascribed to the influence of the sentimental novel and the Shakespearean and Jacobean theatre. This paper highlights a third influence, Baroque painting, by delineating how the two novels refer to the sensuous appeals of the Baroque art in order to deliver their messages in a corporal manner. The Baroque painting of Counter-Reformation, as sanctioned by the Catholic Church, engages the viewers affectively in order to uphold the dominant ideology. Conversely, this paper aims to demonstrate how the sensuous appeals in these two fictions in effect disrupt the restored order despite the celebration of renewal (in Radcliffe's novel) and the enactment of retribution (in Lewis's novel). On the one hand, Ann Radcliffe anchors the characters' emotion through landscape descriptions which culminate in a universal epithalamium. However, the triple receding frames emerging at the end of the novel foreground a vigilant skepticism that questions the validity of hope as it is built upon knowledge gathered through sensuous experiences. Ultimately, the pastoral harmony fails to contain death for the provenance of the wax cadaver, the core of the mystery in Udolpho Castle, is disclosed only to the reader, not to the heroine. On the other hand, Matthew Gregory Lewis exploits this motif of memento mori in Radcliffe through twin diptychs that end in a spectacle of corporeal apocalypse which dissolves all sensibilities by exposing the corpse of its protagonist in the process of decomposition. The tension between veiling and exposing is best examined in a series of paired tableaux-nature/death, Virgin/Venus, and Madonna/Death-that organize the two novels into companion piece to each other, with their connection fixated on the figure of death. By configuring the relationship between these paired tableaux, this paper refutes conservative readings of these two fictions as serving the dominant ideology by illustrating how Radcliffe and Lewis bring forth radically contingent worldviews which lead them to reflect on their own art. |