英文摘要 |
This paper investigates the effectiveness of conservatism in mitigating the agency problems among stakeholders. The empirical results indicate that conservative accounting reduces moral hazard caused by managers' limited horizons and limited liability, and agency problems due to deviation between control and cash flow rights and agency conflicts between bondholders and shareholders. However, conservative accounting cannot mitigate interest conflicts induced by free cash flows and directors' shares collateralization. Our results also show that firms tend to use less conservative accounting when there are other governance mechanisms in the firms to reduce agency conflicts, such as high cash dividend payout ratio. |