英文摘要 |
This paper investigates whether ex post disclosures of prior-period estimation errors in accounting accruals provide value-relevant information to investors and whether such disclosures discourage opportunistic reporting by managers. Several researchers argue that by requiring managers to disclose past estimation errors, the financial reporting system can increase the reliability of estimates and at the same time preserve the relevance of reported earnings. There is, however, litter empirical evidence on the validity of this argument. Using the mandated disclosures of prior-period estimation errors in product warranty liabilities required by FIN 45, I find that investors attach a smaller valuation multiple to unexpected earnings for firm-quarters with more variable past estimation errors in product warranty liabilities (i.e., less precise past earnings), suggesting that investors consider ex post disclosures of past estimation errors decision-relevant. The differential valuation multiples are observed only after but not before the information about past estimation precision becomes available to the market. Moreover, there is an association between current period estimation errors in product warranty liabilities and proxies for the occurrence of earnings management in the current period. Such an association becomes less pronounced after the implementation of FIN 45, implying that the ex post disclosures of prior-period estimation errors curb accrual management through product warranty liabilities. |