This study compares and contrasts Patrick Modiano’s The Search Warrant and Ernest Hemingway’s A Moveable Feast. On the face of it, these are very different, but in fact similarities cross these two major works of literature. These similarities will form the core of my analyses, with the similarities-cum-differences of the works creating a fascinating cross-hatching and asymmetry within a same-ness. These factors yield a transgression of time, venue and approach that links the mid-20th and early 21st centuries.
In some senses, a principle aim of this work is a philosophical study of sadness, the forfeiture of youth and innocence, and loneliness in life—the “poor and precious secrets” that impact humanity every day. In this regard, similarities are found in these two works including plaintive loss, loneliness, and the search for youth. Connected to this are considerations of loss in life, dreams, hunger, searching, and hope for recovery. All of these themes brings these two works yet closer together.
Further, and even deeper, the aim in this paper is to examine the idea of place, story world, or physical setting in literature. This will be framed in a brief “theory of place,” to be presented in text below.
In one other examination, these two works are scrutinized within a context of the History of Ideas. This is less a larger, encompassing theory of philosophy, science, etc., and instead is how these authors historicize experience within conceptual and idealistic frameworks, as chronicles of documented and remembered understanding. This analysis reveals the essence of the authors’ main ideas, their attitudes and points of view, and it is hoped that it will highlight value in these works.