| 英文摘要 |
Recent years have witnessed considerable research output on public deliberation from the perspectives of normative theory and empirical study. Deliberative democracy has become a key topic in the study of democracy. Research on civic education in the Western society has somehow followed this trend. Academics have begun to discuss the implementation of learning deliberative democracy in schools. However, some might question the fairness of practising deliberative democracy. They emphasized that “rational thinking” and “objective expression” could be detrimental to the disadvantaged communities and thus constitute the “pedagogical paradox” of deliberative democracy in a multicultural society; that is, it is possible to exercise oppression in the name of empowerment. This paper provides an interdisciplinary perspective—integrating political theory and the philosophy of education—for investigating the relationship between deliberative democracy and disadvantaged citizens in multicultural society. By borrowing the theoretical framework of Iris Marion Young’s “communicative democracy,” this paper articulates the possible discursive formats and normative constraints for the implementation of public deliberation. It aims to provide a normative response to the pedagogical paradox by examining the use of public deliberation under the framework of multiculturalism. By reconstructing communicative democracy and liberalism, this paper provides a theoretical reference for empirical studies on deliberative civic education, so as to examine the applicability of deliberative civic education in a multicultural society. |