英文摘要 |
The Act of Gender Equality in Employment has been indispensable in preventing workplace gender inequality and guaranteeing equal rights in the workplace for all genders. However, in regard to the common hostile working environments and related sexual harassments, employers’ scope for prevention and control only extends to sexual harassment that employees receive ’’in the course of…executing his or her duties.’’ Therefore, disputes arise over whether the employee was ’’in the course of executing his or her duties.’’ In this paper, work hours are used as the basis to deliberate the environment and other conditions under which duties are executed; an attempt is made to differentiate between three types of sexual harassment—those encountered by employees while executing duties in work environments that the employer controls and manages, those encountered in environments that the employer cannot control or manage, and those encountered while participating in activities expected by the employer. The intrinsic relevance of the time and venue while executing duties is then further analyzed. Finally, this paper proposes that the execution of duties should not be limited to the determination of working hours by the Labor Standards Act; rather, emphasis should be placed on the nature and determination of sexual harassment occurring after the acceptance of coworker invitations to have dinner after work. Such factors should be considered before systems are proposed for determining how the three sexual harassment laws shall be integrated. |