The study uses the reports of the corporate governance rankings (2014 to 2016) to examine the correlation between the number of rankings of the corporate governance reports and the cost of equity. The empirical results show that the results of the corporate governance in 2014 were insignificantly and positively related to the cost of equity. Furthermore, the second and third years have a significant positive correlation with the cost of equity, and it claims when the number of rankings is increased, the correlation between the ranking of corporate governance and the cost of equity is getting clearer. In addition, a positive correlation between the ranking of corporate governance and the cost of equity indicates that the investors are more likely to need more premium from higher-ranking firms, and generate more risk from this investment.