月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
師大學報:科學教育類 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
生物認知偏好與教學能力相關屬性的關係
並列篇名
The Relationship between Biology Cognitive Preferences and Teacher Attributes Related to Teaching Competency
作者 鄭湧涇
中文摘要
本研究探索職前及在職生物教師之生物認知偏好風格,並探究認知偏好與教學能力相關屬性的關係。結果顯示,全體樣本之生物認知偏好取向為Q(批判質疑)、P(原理原則)> A (知識應用) > R (記憶),表示生物教師於處理生物學知識時,偏好對知識批判質疑和掌握知識之原理原則,而不喜記誦科學知識。職前(Sr)、本科系(BM)和非本科系(NBM)三群生物教師之生物認知偏好風格有顯著差異,Sr之生物認知偏好取向為Q>P、A>R,表現「高Q偏好、低R偏好」;BM之生物認知偏好取向為Q、P、A>P,表現「高Q、P、A偏好,低R偏好」;NBM之生物認知偏好取向為P>A、R、Q,表現「高P偏好,低A、R、Q偏好」。Sr和BM對Q認知偏好型式的偏好顯著高於NBM,對R和P型式的偏好則顯著低於NBM。生物教師之生物教材能力和科學態度與Q偏好型式有正相關,與R偏好型式呈負相關,與P和A偏好型式之間則無顯著相關。職前生物教師之生物探討技能和「對科學的本質的了解」與P偏好型式呈正相關,而與其他三項認知偏好型式之間則無顯著相關。若將樣本依Q-R分數的高低,分成Q(批判分析)型、M(中間)型和R(記憶知識)型,變異數分析的結果顯示,Q型教師的生物教材能力和科學態度顯著優於M型和R型教師,而M型和R型教師之間則無顯著差異。
英文摘要
This study investigated the biology cognitive preferences of pre- and in-service biology teachers and examined the relationships between cognitive preferences and teacher attributes related to teaching competency. The results showed that the subjects exhibited a cognitive preference style of Questioning (Q), Principles (P) > Application (A) > Recall (R). This indicated that the subjects displayed a strong preference for questioning and principles and a weak preference for memorizing biological information. Significant differences in the biology cognitive preference styles were found among three groups of sub-jects, namely, preservice (Seniors), biology-major (BM) and nonbiology-major (NBM) biology teachers. Seniors exhibited a cognitive preference style of Q>P, A>R which indicated a strong preference for questioning and a weak preference for recall. BM exhibited a cognitive preference style of Q, P, A>R which indicated a strong preference for questioning, principles and application and a weak preference for recall. While NBM exhibited a cognitive preference style of P > A, R, Q which indicated a strong preference for principles and a weak preference for application, recall, and questioning. In addition, Seniors and BM showed a higher preference for Q mode and a lower preference for R and P modes than NBM. Biology subject-matter competency and scientific attitudes correlated positively with Q pref-erence mode, but negatively with R preference mode. However, no significant correlation was found be-tween biology subject matter competency, scientific attitudes and P and A preference modes. Biology inquiry skills and the understanding of the nature of science of preservice teachers correlated positively with P preference mode. But, no significant correlation was found between the two teacher attributes and the other three cognitive preference modes. The subjects were further categorized into three groups based on Q-R scores, namely as Q-type (critical questioning), M-type (Medium), and R-type (memoriz-ing information). Oneway ANOVA revealed that the biology subject matter competency and scientific attitudes of Q-type teachers were significant better than those of M- and R-type teacher groups. While no significant differences were found between M- and R-type teacher groups.
起訖頁 47-61
關鍵詞 生物認知偏好生物教材能力生物探討技能科學態度教學能力對科學的本質的了解
刊名 師大學報:科學教育類  
期數 199804 (43:1期)
出版單位 國立臺灣師範大學
該期刊-上一篇 民間團體推動環境教育活動內涵之研究
該期刊-下一篇 動態複製模型對遞回程式設計教學之影響
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄