| 英文摘要 |
The article aims to articulate a critique and a reassessment of P. Petersen’s theory, and by doing so to provide an alternative model as well as a new way in thinking about Taiwan’s school education reform in remote areas. I first give a hermeneutic account of Petersen’s theory and practice in terms of Taiwan’s school education reform debate and further explore what Petersen’s Jenaplan can contribute to it. It shows that Jenaplan’s ideas of learning in community life, mixed-age class teaching and weekly work schedule turn out to be most promising for Taiwan’s situation regarding the common features of lower general scholastic abilities, learning motivation and social interaction of pupils in Taiwan’s remote areas in comparison to those in urban areas. The article accordingly suggests that we can initiate in remote areas a new program which, according to the above-mentioned ideas, educates pupils in such a manner that schooling is integrated with community life and interdisciplinary, multiple and flexible learning environment, and such integration can really benefits those with special educational needs. |