英文摘要 |
The main purpose of this paper is to investigate whether, under the country-of-origin labeling (COOL), Taiwanese consumers would prefer the domestically produced oyster and oolong tea than smuggled oyster from China or imported tea from China and Vietnam. Furthermore, we also attempt to analyze the differences in purchasing behavior between different genders and risk perceptions. Data source is based on a telephone survey sponsored by the Council of Agriculture in 2008; the targeted population included food shoppers aged over 20 and have indoor phones. Using a stratified systematic sampling method, a total sample of 1,028 interviews was collected. This survey was based on the contingent valuation method (CVM), and we used both close-ended and open-ended questions to elicit the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for foods produced in Taiwan vs. other countries of origin. Based on the close-ended question, we use the binary and multinomial logit models to estimate the price premiums for Taiwan oyster and oolong tea when all products were clearly with COOL. Furthermore, we also apply Tobit model to estimate the WTP from the open-ended questions. The econometric results show that people in Taiwan would pay considerable price premiums to avoid buying the smuggled oyster from China and oolong tea imported from China and Vietnam. The study also finds that females are more conscious of food safety problems than males because females are more willing to pay a higher price premium on domestic oyster and oolong tea. Besides, we also find that people in Taiwan who care more about food safety risk are willing to pay higher price premiums for domestic oyster and oolong tea in order to avoid buying these likely unsafe products from other countries. The study concludes that Taiwan government should vigorously enforce the COOL law because it would not only enhance the competitiveness of our agriculture but also could protect the right of consumers in Taiwan. |