英文摘要 |
This research adopts 'power and knowledge', knowledge democratisation, scientific democratisation, and localisation as theoretical tools. Firstly, this research reviews the western ethno-/ anthropological studies on agriculture and analyses Social Darwinism, cultural relativism, economic anthropology, cultural ecology, development studies, post-development studies, etc. for realising the western academic background. Second, this research reviews Taiwan's ethno-/ anthropological studies on agriculture to realise the change of academic research by stages of: the beginning of scientific research, the post-war demobilization- oriented research, the emphasis on indigenous and Han Chinese's rural studies, and diversified agricultural research. Besides, this research also reviews the author's doctoral study field - the agricultural studies in Sanxing Township, Yilan, and attempts to show the research tendency. The result shows that no matter what in the West or Taiwan, the 'national' governance always plays an important role on either folk knowledge being created by power or being empowered by folk themselves to create their knowledge/ the-right-to-speak. While ethno-/ anthropological studies on agriculture in Taiwan is mingled with power and knowledge, it facilitates the structural change by knowledge democratised, scientific democratised and academic localised which such change is helpful to make ethno-/ anthropological studies more diversified and 'bottoms up' the agricultural policies to implement the concern to 'human beings' simultaneously. |