歷史期刊文獻引用偏好與引用檔案分析：2006—2014年變化

The Development of Citation Preference and Archival Application in Historical Journals between 2006 and 2014

本研究藉由分析重要歷史期刊文獻之引用文獻，瞭解學者引用資料特性與檔案資料被引用情形，分析對象以THCICore收錄之四份歷史學一級期刊為分析對象，彙整2006—2014年間《中央研究院近代史研究所集刊》、《臺灣史研究》、《國立政治大學歷史學報》、《臺大歷史學報》等四份期刊，總計469篇論著，32,055篇引用文獻，分析引用資料類型、時間、語文以及平均引文量，並針對其中被引用的3,042篇檔案資料，分析被引用之檔案類型、年代、語文、檔案全宗與檔案館藏來源，以描繪出史學研究者引用文獻與引用檔案資料特性。研究發現史學者引用資料以專書為主，檔案僅占引文總數約一成的比例，經常被引用的檔案資料類型為公文書，引用文獻與檔案資料語文以中文為主，經常被使用的檔案來自臺灣文史機構以及因地緣關係與臺灣歷史密切之國家檔案館，研究結果期許可提供檔案館藏發展與使用服務作業之參考。

This study analyzes works cited in influential historical journals to explore citation characteristics and archival applications in the field of history. The research data are composed of references cited between 2006 and 2014 in four THCI Core historical journals, including Bulletin of the Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, Taiwan Historical Research, The Journal of History, NCCU, and Historical Inquiry, NTU. The archival types, languages, publication years, and the average number of citations of a total of 469 journal articles with their 32,055 cited references are analyzed. Among these cited references, 3,042 pieces of works and records are specifically selected to delineate citation characteristics of historical researchers. Research results show that monographs are the main type of cited references, while archives make up about ten percent of cited references. Most of the cited archives are official records. Most of the cited references were written in Chinese. Sources of frequently cited references include literary and historical institutions in Taiwan and National Archives Administration. Research results of this study may serve as reference for the future development of archival collection and user service.