原住民族狩獵與規範衝突──文化、權力、刑法與憲法的四角習題

Indigenous Hunting and Conflicts of Norms: A Dual Dilemma from the Perspectives of Culture, Power, Criminal and Constitutional Law

本文從一則原住民持土製長槍狩獵野生動物遭刑事有罪判決之案件（王光祿案）談起，嘗試分析背後所涉及的文化、權力、刑法與憲法之間交錯關聯的四角習題。論述內容分成三大部分：首先建構文化與規範衝突的基本觀點，作為分析架構與論證基礎。文中指出狩獵「違法」只是表象，深層的問題是文化的可規範性。繼之，進行王光祿案的問題解析，分別從原住民槍砲管制與狩獵管理兩方面，檢討現行法規的體系關聯與司法實務的論證理由。最後，提出若干反思性觀點，期能開啟憲法釋義與刑法體系的比較課題與法學新思維。

This article starts off from the Tama Talum case, which concerns a verdict of guilty on Taiwanese Indigenous People owing to the hunting of wildlife with self-made shotguns. This article endeavors to analyze the intertwined issues of culture, power, criminal and constitutional law involved in this case. It first builds up the analytical framework and discursive foundation based on one basic point. That is, what underneath this 'unlawful' hunting and possession of guns is issue regarding whether culture could be subject to legal norm. This article then dissects relevant disputes in this case, including gun control and hunting management against indigenous people. It examines the systematic relations within existing law and arguments in judicial practice. In the end, this article provides some reflections, and is expected to initiate comparative holistic thinking between constitutional interpretation and criminal law system so as to open up a novel field in legal study.