| 英文摘要 |
Scholars of International Relations became interested in economic issues in the 1970s, but the study of economic issues was conducted separately from the study of military statecraft, and national security issues more generally. Consequently, International Political Economy and International Security developed into two separate fields, with such a separation persisting even after the Cold War. Some attribute the lack of interest in the economics-security nexus in the IR community to the fact that few IPE specialists are familiar with security literature, while even fewer security analysts are familiar with theories and concepts used by IPE and economics scholars. The paper assumes that economic forces should play a more fundamental role in shaping the role of the state in international economics and the interests of those who control the state. The paper begins with an analysis of two big events that fundamentally change the meaning of national security: the 1997 financial crisis in Asia and the September 11 terrorist attack in 2001. Next the paper explores two questions: First, is the meaning of national security fundamentally changed since the end of the Cold War, since economic factors have replaced military ones to be the crucial factors in shaping the overall security environment? Second, how do scholars formulate a political economic approach to analyze the developments of security issues? The author proposes three different perspectives to understand economics-security connections, each represents a distinctive view of national security, and the functions of the state in handling security issues. |