英文摘要 |
Do investors believe what companies say in major announcements? Do investors buy into the clarification from companies regarding media coverage? This paper examines listed companies in the electronics industry and the three traditional industries of steel, plastics, and building materials and construction. It further classifies company announcements into the three categories of natural disasters, man-induced events, and responses to media reports. The empirical results suggest that when natural disasters strike, the market finds 'business-as-usual' announcements from electronics companies to be more convincing than similar statements from companies in the traditional industries, resulting in limited abnormal and negative returns. However, in the case of negative man-made events, the market finds 'business-as-usual' announcements from companies in the traditional industries to be more convincing than similar statements from electronics companies. After negative news coverage in the media, the share prices for companies in traditional industries will stabilize after clarifications from the companies (in comparison to electronics companies). For electronics companies, after good news coverage, the share prices will continue to rise and the companies will react positively and have abnormal returns, even when the companies deny the media stories. The market will also react positively and has abnormal returns when electronics companies deny the media coverage concerning changes to their capital structures. Finally, investors will remain convinced of the media coverage and the market will react positively and has abnormal returns if companies do not specifically respond to positive news concerning their financial forecasts. In sum, the media plays a pivotal role in the context of information asymmetry. Regression analysis finds that the market to book ratio is the important factor that affects the market reaction toward the information announced passively by companies. |