月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
德國保全沒收之扣押法——德國刑訴第111b條至第111p條釋義——
並列篇名
The seizure for confiscation of German law
作者 王士帆姜明誼
中文摘要
我國 2016 年 7 月 1 日施行犯罪所得沒收新法,修法主要參考德國法。 惟德國於 2016 年 3 月 9 日,先公布《刑法財產剝奪改革法案》草案,經德國 立法審議修改通過後,於 2017 年 7 月 1 日施行。關於德國《刑事訴訟法》 保全沒收與追徵之扣押法,除將舊法概念與文字加以修正,以符合《歐盟 2014/42/EU 指令》,而達到有效國際司法互助外,最重要者在於加強暫時性 的保全措施,將階段性法則明定於保全規定,使追訴機關能靈活使用保全沒 收與追徵之扣押措施。其次,德國新法體系雖承繼德國舊法的雙軌制,但 與舊法扣押與財產假扣押混合規定的情況不同,新法大幅度將兩者法規體 系化。另外,新法為達簡化法規之目的,刪除舊法財產假扣押大量準用德 國《民事訴訟法》之規定,以解決舊法時,實務刑事司法對於民事法規的理 解困難,以及準用條款之複雜。最後,因應德國《刑法》刪除被害人潛在條 款、被害人賠償法之重構,亦於德國《刑事訴訟法》保全沒收與追徵之扣押 法中,增設偵查程序中導入債務清理程序之條款。
英文摘要
On July 1, 2016, Taiwan enforced the new law of confiscation of proceeds of crime of Criminal Code, and the main reference source is German law. However, on March 9, 2016, Germany announced the draft of Criminal Property Deprivation Reform Act and enforced on July 1, 2017. In addition to amending the concepts and texts of the old law in order to comply with the 2014/42/EU on the understanding of confiscation, and to achieve the goal of effectively helping international mutual legal assistance, the most important thing is to strengthen temporary safeguard measures. The new law is clearly defined the stage rule in the approval of seizure, so that the criminal prosecution agency can flexibly use the seizure measures for the confiscation and compulsory collection, and also emphasizes the necessity of seizure. Although the new law system still maintains the dual-track system of the old law, it is different from the seizure of old law. The new law systematically stipulates the law and clearly distinguishes the system of seizure for confiscation and the seizure for compulsory collection. In addition, in order to simplify the regulations and to solve the criminal practice has difficulty understanding of the civil regulations, and the complex terms of the use of the old law, the seizure for compulsory collection applied the Civil Procedure Law of Germany is deleted by the new law. The new law also deletes the provisions of the seizure period and will be handed over to the principle of proportionality. Because the Criminal Law of Germany deletes the potential clause of the victim and the reconstruction of the victim compensation legal system, it also adds the provisions of the bankruptcy law in the investigation procedure in the Criminal Procedure Law of Germany.
起訖頁 35-72
關鍵詞 保全沒收之扣押保全追徵之財產假扣押犯罪所得德國刑事訴 訟法the seizure for confiscation the seizure for compulsory collection proceed of crime Criminal Procedure Law of Germany
刊名 刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集  
期數 202010 (22期)
出版單位 法務部司法官學院犯罪防治研究中心
該期刊-上一篇 日本人民參審與刑事司法改革
該期刊-下一篇 法人刑事責任之歸責法制——以美國模式為核心
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄