英文摘要 |
In recent years, the extreme rainfall due to the global climate change in recent years, and the large amount of surface runoff resulting from the rapid expansion of urban areas in Taiwan, have contributed to overload of the urban drainage system, causing severe flooding. Flooding has become a significant issue when facing disaster by urban areas in Taiwan. The water law has been amended to include a chapter ‘runoff apportion and outflow control' on reducing surface runoff by land management. However, applying this principle to urban land development management is a new issue in urban planning. Within urban planning, urban design takes the responsibility of land zoning under a detailed plan, and of applying building administration connections. Thus, urban design abroad has for a long time applied stormwater management strategies to reduce surface runoff. Hence, how to apply rainstorm management strategies to urban design in Taiwan, remains an unsolved issue. This research consists of two sections. The first section examines the link between urban design review system and urban rainstorm management strategies of the municipalities in Taiwan, in order to form an overview on the difficulties facing local governments in applying urban stormwater management in practical contexts. The second section describes simulations using the development area of Phase I Development Zone of Danhai New Town as the research target to do the simulations. Based on current regulations and applications of stormwater management, the simulation considers rainfall retention results, in order to identify the optimal solutions and the effectiveness of stormwater management strategies for runoff apportion under different rainfall intensities in undeveloped and fully developed cases. The current mechanism and executable practices are summarized to choices and recommendations for practising stormwater management strategies.The conclusions of this study are as follows: 1. In addition to keeping retention facilities, urban planners should set up Low Impact Development (LID) facilities in public facilities and private building bases according to geographic characteristics (Case 3). Case 3 provides better water retention then keeping retention facilities on in public facilities (Case 2) or obeying current regulations (Case 1 and Case 4), particularly at five-year recurrence intervals. 2. Obeying current rainfall retention regulations (Case 1 and Case 4) does not yield effective retention results, with the peak discharge declining by only 4.51% at the two-year interval to 4.59% at the 100-year interval. Additionally, this study suggests that applying stormwater management strategies on local urban design reduces local surface runoff more effectively at 2-year to 10-year intervals. The most effective strategy is to set up water retention facilities and LID facilities in public facilities and private building bases (Case 3). Some prerequisites exist for applying stormwater management on the current urban design review system and yielding effective results: guidance for regional runoffs from the urban design levels, the comprehensive local urban design that combines the contents and illustration of the current urban design review system, and establishing related departments in charge of lateral communication of the rainfall retention affairs. |