台灣廠商躍過反傾銷稅直接投資之實證分析

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON THE ANTIDUMPINGJUMPING FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT BY TAIWANESE FIRM

當出口廠商遭遇反傾銷控訴後，可以使用直接投資替代出口來規避反傾銷稅，這稱為躍過反傾銷稅直接投資。目前台灣被提控反傾銷之密集度在全球名列第1名，但卻尚未有研究台灣廠商躍過反傾銷稅直接投資之實證文章。本研究以1987－2014年間台灣廠商被控訴反傾銷案例為研究對象，共包括13個對台灣提控國家、70個案例、228家廠商。以事件歷史研究法的實證結果指出，台灣廠商被控訴反傾銷，會刺激廠商進行躍過反傾銷稅直接投資，而進行直接投資的國家以第三國為主。

When facing antidumping allegations, exporters may consider foreign direct investment (FDI) as an alternative to evade antidumping duties. This is referred to as antidumpingjumping FDI. Currently, Taiwan is the country with the highest frequency of receiving dumping accusations in the world. However, there are currently no empirical research papers on the behavior of antidumping-jumping FDI. Focusing on the antidumping lawsuits against Taiwan during the period of 1987–2014, this research covers 13 countries that have filed antidumping lawsuits against Taiwan, 70 cases and 228 companies. Event history analysis is adopted for this paper. The empirical results show that antidumping lawsuits stimulate companies to implement antidumping-jumping FDI. The destinations of such investments are mainly in a third-country.