英文摘要 |
This article discusses the usage limitation of the biological material from public biological resource centers (BRCs).Based on the methodology of comparative law and legal hermeneutics, we analyze ECCO core MTA and MOSAICC MTA, ATCC MTA and the related cotract provisions of Bioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC)in Taiwan. We suggest that public BRCs shall only be the custodian. Through the channel of international conventions, acts, MTAs, public BRCs may implement. the protection for the numerous subjects by the cooperation on establishing the international mechanism of prior notification and benefit sharing. When the tracking system exists and the third party is also under the same contract, the biological meterial may be exchanged between different public BRCs or the cooperative scientists by open access lincense. To compensate the financial losses of public BRCs, the government may recognize BRCs as natonal scientific infrastructure and offer the financial subsidies. When the user intends to conduct commercial use , the user shall inform the BRCs , and negotiate the benefit sharing affairs with related parties. |