英文摘要 |
This paper probes the right to select surname. It concerns three issues: first, what is the character of surname; second, who is the subject of right to select surname; third, what is the ambit of right to select surname. It arranges analyses of comparative and international human rights laws in related fields to reflect on domestic rules.This paper argues that, since right to have a name is part of personal right which is an individual right, right to select surname, being part of right to have a name, should also be regarded as an individual right. An individual herself/himself is the subject of such right. Parents or guardians choose surname for their children because of their parental rights.Concerning the ambit of right to select surname, this paper considers that a surname, viewing from the relationship of surname and blood, origins and developments of surnames and international viewpoints, tends to be a term for an individual. Therefore, the state should not overly limit a person's right to choose, change or restore a surname.This paper also argues that Taiwan should consider abolishing the regulation that only Chinese surnames in normal dictionaries can be chosen. The state should not limit a person to choose a surname only between those of her/his mother or father. At least the state should a combined surname from parents; or even more choices. S/he should also have a right not to select surname. The state should also guarantee people the right to change and restore their surnames. The bottom line could be a combined surname; a middle way is to allow changing surname for significant reasons; the advanced approach is to permit changing of surname unless in special conditions. |