英文摘要 |
While discussing the subject of employee compensation, the jurisprudence in Taiwan mostly focused on the issues such as employee bonus, employee stock ownership, employee stock option or restricted stock, which is recently added in the Company Act of Taiwan. In fact, under these said instruments for employee compensation the employees are granted cash or stocks. There are no other options for employers, which seems to be insufficient. Trying to find out other legal concepts in comparative law, this essay starts with a research on the employee participation in German labor law, and then the relating regulations in German corporate law are analyzed and its legitimacy as well. Based on the results of research on German law this essay returns to the regulations regarding to the aforementioned topics of the employee compensation in Taiwan, especially how those regulations are interpreted and applied. Finally, for the future development of employee compensation in Taiwan a proposal is made herein as followed: Paragraph 235 subparagraph 2 of Taiwan Corporate Act could be abolished. An employee compensation scheme negotiated by employees and employers could be a better solution instead. Even if it would be necessary to remain the mandatory element of this regulation for certain legal political reasons, it is advisable to replace this legally forced profit-sharing regulation with an employee compensation program including diverse instruments for employee compensation. |