英文摘要 |
As the popular saying expresses, “Taiwan won't be better until the KMT is overthrown,” the Sunflower Movement with its “anti-China Factor” cause gave rise to major political changes in Taiwan. In elections in 2014 and 2016 after the Sunflower movement, the KMT government stepped down, and the DPP became the majority both in the local and the central government. However, in controversies such as TPP, the amendment of the Labor Standards Act, environmental protection, land justice issues, etc., the DPP regime still prioritizes capitalists' interests. The phenomenon may be described as the “Clausewitzian enchantment”. Although the effect of the Sunflower Movement led to the political change, the concern of economic equality, that is supposedly the main issue in this anti-free trade movement, also gave way to the political aspiration for the defense of democracy against the “China Factor”, and the problems of capitalism was displaced with the problems of Taiwan as a democratic subject in relation to China. How to understand such displacement? What conjuncture gives rise to this political culture and what kind of emotion lies in the call for the defense of democracy? What political subject does the defense of democracy constitute? This paper contextualizes the political emotion in the movement's call for “the defense of democracy” and its political aspiration for going “beyond the party line” (i.e. “beyond ‘Blue' and ‘Green'”). This paper points out that the defense of democracy “beyond ‘Blue' and ‘Green'” emerged in 2004, particularly since the CHEN Shui Bian's corruption in 2006. It represents an emotion of discontent with and an aspiration for political civilization in relation to Taiwanese political identity vis-à-vis China. Such an aspiration for political civilization has aroused popular anxiety for political changes and displaced economic inequalities with the anti-China sentiment after 2008. Eventually the “defense of democracy” has become its own paradox. |