概念與存有──康德與黑格爾論上帝不可知或可知

Concept and Being-Kant and Hegel on Unknowability or Knowability of God

康德與黑格爾在知識論立場上的分歧，如水火不相容，有關於此，他們各自賦予上帝觀念的懸殊意涵，是一個清楚的指標。他們兩位有一個共同的上帝觀念，即「至真實存有」（ens realissimum），但是這個上帝稱號在雙方所含有的意義，迥然不同。康德與黑格爾在有關對上帝的認知立場上的不同，應當可以歸因於他們對上帝問題的旨趣的不同。他們旨趣的差別，則與他們各自秉持的神學世界觀的歧異，息息相關。本文要從他們各自的形上旨趣觀點與哲學論述的方法，剖析和比較他們有關上帝觀念的論述。康德與黑格爾在知識論立場上的分歧，如水火不相容，有關於此，他們各自賦予上帝觀念的懸殊意涵，是一個清楚的指標。他們兩位有一個共同的上帝觀念，即「至真實存有」（ens realissimum），但是這個上帝稱號在雙方所含有的意義，迥然不同。康德與黑格爾在有關對上帝的認知立場上的不同，應當可以歸因於他們對上帝問題的旨趣的不同。他們旨趣的差別，則與他們各自秉持的神學世界觀的歧異，息息相關。本文要從他們各自的形上旨趣觀點與哲學論述的方法，剖析和比較他們有關上帝觀念的論述。

The epistemological positions of Kant and Hegel are greatly different, and the meanings they give to the idea of God play a clear indication to it. Both of them have the same idea of God as ”ens realissimum,” but they understand it differently. The reasons why there is a great difference between the two philosophers could be seen in the fact that the purport of their dealing with the problems of God is different and their theological views of the world are not the same. In this article I propose to contrast Kant's statement on the idea of God with Hegel's on the basis of their respective metaphysical ideas and methods.