英文摘要 |
In neutral markets, asset price changes within a narrow window, thus securities with linear returns, such as stocks or futures, are difficult to profit; however, using neutral option trading strategies (like short straddles, short stangles, butterfly spreads, or iron butterflies) are easy to profit in such markets. To take advantages of both “being not easy to profit for the underlying securities in neutral markets” and “risk controll”, this paper uses a butterfly spread strategy and an iron butterfly strategy as examples to theoretically and empirically investigage their risk/return characteristics and then to infer the effective market environments and strategy features of using neutral option trading strategies. An important and interesting finding is that the profiles of profit/loss diagrams of a butterfly spread strategy and an iron butterfly strategy are similar; however, the risk/return characteristics of these two strategies are totally different. Nevertheless, both two strategies share the insurance effect, while other neutral option trading strategies such as short straddles and short stangles have not. This paper also finds that the most important variable that influences the strategy returns is the growth rate of stock prices μ. For most markets, the long-term growth rates of stock prices are not neutral (μ>0), thus application of neutral option market strategies is not profitable. In Taiwan, stock market often shows a neutral market feature (μ≈0) in some specific periods, trading underlying stocks is not easy to profit, however, using neutral option strategies and properly adjusting the strike price in consistent with the growth rate can be profitable. Finally, our empirical results are consistent with the theoretical trends. |