英文摘要 |
In the past, buildings before the urban renewal were mostly old houses of low-story, brick, reinforced, or reinforced concrete apartment types. After the urban renewal, new buildings are enjoyed government policy concessions, so the houses after the urban renewal will be the application of a higher unit construction standard price leads to a large difference in the amount of house tax for new and old houses, which leads to a huge rise in house tax. The excessive increase in house tax is probably the government's original enactment of urban renewal regulations. Under such circumstances, the current urban renewal of tax incentives has prevented them from proceeding further, and it is necessary to review whether the urban renewal of tax incentives does not actually achieve the purpose of concessions. The increase in taxation leads to a reduction in people's consumption expenditure, which in turn leads to a reduction in GNP. After the government increases taxation, it will also increase government expenditure. However, the increase in government expenditure is usually not equal to the increase in taxation. There is a chance that the two will increase or decrease in equal amounts nearly zero, the governmental arbitrary increase in taxes is unfavorable to the overall financial environment. Even if government spending and taxes increase at the same time, it will hinder rather than stimulate the growth of the private sector, leading to simultaneous increases in unemployment and inflation. This article proposes a legislative example of the U.S. metropolitan tax Concessions preferential policy and legal economic analysis methods, and proposes a better solution to the urban renewal tax Concessions preferences in Taiwan, in an attempt to contribute to the relevant legal system. |