論不能安全駕駛罪之解釋與適用──以刑法第185條之3第1項第1款為中心

Dogmatic Problems with Unfit to Drive by §185-3 Criminal Code

2013年，不能安全駕駛罪修訂時，立法者將酒測值直接規定於犯罪構成要件。由此衍生出不少解釋上的疑慮，例如酒測值應作為客觀不法構成要件，或是理解為客觀處罰條件？此種要件的定性問題主要涉及到我們如何評價行為人於行為時的危險故意。本文認為，酒測值既不是客觀不法構成要件，也不是客觀處罰條件，而是作為一種與「不法量化」有關的「類似重大門檻要件」。另外，動力交通工具的動力僅限於由「引擎驅動」，至於由人力或任由自然物理力（例如在坡道滑行）驅動者，不包括在內。若是欲將後面兩者納入不能安全駕駛罪的規制範疇，有必要透過修法方式將「動力交通工具」修訂為「交通工具」。 From 2013, the blood alcohol concentration is regulated in §185-3 criminal code. Therefore, a controversial doctrinal problem, namely the blood alcohol content is produced as an objective fact, or as an objective criminality condition should be considered. It is about the evaluation of the so-called ''Danger intent'' in relation to the value of the blood alcohol concentration. Here, the author argues that blood alcohol concentration does not act as an objective fact or as an objective condition of criminal liability, but as an analogical clause of the significance threshold. In addition, the feature 'vehicle' is limited to the motor vehicle. The other powered vehicle by muscle power should be integrated in the future by the amendment of the law.