英文摘要 |
The initial purpose of counterclaim in ICSID investment arbitration rules is to reveal the facts of the dispute, promote the process of economic and ensure consistency of the awards. Moreover, the procedural rights between parties can adjust their substantive rights. So that the realization of the state counterclaim can contribute to accelerate the efficiency of investment arbitration and maintain the balance between the parties. The practice shows that counterclaim was suppressed in most of the time. Hence, the ICSID arbitral tribunal should improve the success rate of the counterclaim by interpreting the treaty actively and adopt the criterion of multiple correlation standard in the process of arbitration, and the State ought to modify the structure of substantive rights and obligations in their future treaties. |