從OPI與舊式日本語能力測驗之相關性看日語學習者的會話能力－－以文藻外語學院為例

The Oral Proficiency of Japanese Learners in Taiwan by the Results of the Correlation between the OPI and the Japanese-Language Proficiency Test-The Case of Japanese Learners in Wenzao Ursuline College of Language

本研究筆者以文藻外語學院日文系三年級的學生作為對象，進行OPI（Oral Proficiency Interview）的程度判定。研究目的為從OPI結果來把握班級學習現況與證明OPI 的程度與舊式日能測驗成績的相關性。在台灣，針對學生進行客觀的會話能力測驗、把握班級現狀的研究較少。在此，筆者使用OPI來掌控學習者現今的會話能力。施測結果，大多數的學習者OPI的程度都屬於「中級」。並且，關於OPI 測驗與舊式日能測驗的相關性方面，雖然於先行研究中橫山等人（1998, 2002,2004）已進行了許多研究，但受測者中以中文為母語的學習者只有一位。因此，筆者對於在台灣一般日文學習者是否可以得到相同研究結果抱持疑問，並展開研究。研究結果，證實先行研究的結論無誤，同時證明本研究學習者的OPI 測驗與舊式日能測驗具有相關性。因舊式日能測驗的二級及格分數有差異，從OPI測驗的程度來看，相較於先行研究中受測者較容易達到「上級─下」的程度，本研究中學習者的程度則是到達「中級─上」。並比較在OPI測驗中各種部分（單字、閱讀‧文法、聽力）的資料後，發現學習者相對的在會話方面的能力較為低弱。"

The purpose of this study is to understand the present state and toverify a correlation between the OPI(Oral Proficiency Interview) and thePrevious JLPT(Japanese-Language Proficiency Test) for the Japaneselearners in Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages measured by the OPIbecause there is a few research article has been reported on the presentstate of the oral Japanese proficiency of Taiwanese learner. The result isthat the class mostly consists of intermediate level learners.Likewise, the preceding verification of Yokoyama(2004) which is onlyone Chinese examinee in; this verification, which all learners speakChinese as their mother tongue, also has a correlation between the OPIand the Previous JLPT. The result supports the preceding verification ofYokoyama(1998-2004); however, there is a difference in oral Japaneseproficiency between both examinees. Yokoyama(2004)’s those arerelatively higher level than those in Wenzao.