英文摘要 |
Espionage behavior for hostile countries is a heinous crime, in contrast to its sending countries, it is a supreme patriotic behavior. Therefore, the legal norms of espionage behavior always hold such a law of opposites and contradictions. For the subject, object and state of espionage behavior, which are on military spy, political spy, economic spy, and even the Olympic Games spy, the issue of legal norms in various fields is very complicated. All countries in the world now have narrowly adopted legislation on the legal norms concerning espionage behavior, and there is also generalized legislation. For instance, Japan adopted the General National Defense Security Law before the Second World War. Japan also worked hard to develop a narrow espionage prevention law after the war, but it did not accomplish the goal. Till December, 2013, it was moving toward the development of a generalized case of the Act on Protection of Specially Designated Secrets again. Our country, which is similar to Japan, has adopted generalized Against Military Secret Act legal system; however, the preceding law was repealed in 2004, and was replaced by the Act on Protection of State Secrets. Strictly speaking, the Act on Protection of State Secrets can only be called taxonomy of state secrets. It is modest and limited for deterring espionage crimes. Because of espionage behavior with the development of science and technology, it is more difficult in the legal norms. This article aims to explore the contemporary significance of legal norms of espionage behavior. Hope to arouse people's attention to the increasingly complicated problems of espionage crimes, and provide or inspire new ideas as well as new way of thinking, as a reference for legislative policy to review, amend, and reinforce the omission of current legal system, or to formulate a narrow legal system to ban espionage behavior. |