英文摘要 |
This paper examines whether family firms prefer tax planning than non-family firms or not of Taiwan's listed companies from 1999 to 2008. Tax Planning is a part of corporate operation strategies. A completely tax planning is not just consider about low down tax, either need to consider its nontax cost which include some implicit costs and risk. In Taiwan, the family firms is an important organization type, its high controlling shareholder prevailing situation in which a greater agency conflict between the controlling shareholder and non-controlling shareholders. Such a family enterprise with the characteristics of the company engaged in tax planning, if the company's interests and competing family interests, which will maximize the value of the company or the family interests from consideration? Compared to non-family firms is that? Namely, this research is to explore. In this paper, use three indicators(book-tax difference, residual book-tax difference, effective tax rate) as tax planning proxies. The results show that the relationship between the tax planning and family firms support the hypothesis that family firms have higher tax planning than non-family firms in Taiwan, its contract to the findings of Chen et al.(2010).Therefore, this, in the control of family firms, family firm owners will be based on personal interests and more about the company's tax planning, reflect the family corporate tax planning more in line with the interests of entrenchment hypothesis, consistent with Desai and Dharmapala (2006) findings. The other three corporate governance variables were added to verify whether they will affect the association between family firms and tax planning, regression results show that, compared to non-family firms, the ratio of long-term institutional ownership and the board size have significant effect on the association between family firms and tax planning. |