英文摘要 |
The indigenization movement in psychology that emerged inChinese societies over 20 years ago is an innovative academic enterprise.There are two epistemological and methodological challenges to thisacademic movement: How to understand and respond to the dominationof Western psychology, and how to pursue psychological knowledgethat is compatible both with indigenous and universal principles. Inaddressing these challenges, Chinese scholars’ have made use of differentstrategies which indicate the pursuit of to address cultural subjectivity,that is, the subjectivity upon the legitimation of asserting cultural basisto psychology. In this article, I outline the strategies underlying theworks of Kuo-Shu Yang, Kwang-Kuo Hwang, Wen-Li Soong, andDer-Huey Yee, and delineate how they responded to the challenges.Kuo-Shu Yang portrayed indigenized psychology as a strategy forasserting cultural subjectivity. Kwang-Kuo Hwang advocatedcultural-inclusive psychology as a strategy for addressing culturalsubjectivity to challenge by applying the philosophy of science as aplatform for addressing the hegemony of Western psychology. Wen-LiSoong traced the origins of modern usage of Chinese language andsuggested that this knowledge supports a cultural psychology of Chinese language. Der-Huey Yee presented a strategy for moving fromlanguage to existence in his phenomenological indigenous clinicalpsychology. Analysis of these strategies for cultural subjectivityprovides young psychologists a map to follow in constructing their owninnovative theories and practices for indigenous psychology. |