英文摘要 |
When the parties apply for the registration of transfer of the real estate, the registry’s examination of statutory rights of first refusal is an important issue. However, there are few articles explore it. Part Ⅱ of this study explores the registry’s authority and capability of examination as the foundation of this study. Part Ⅲ discusses the issues concerning registry’s examination of rights of first refusal in explanation. Part Ⅳ deliberates the difference between Paragraph Ⅰ and Paragraph Ⅱ of Article 97 of the Regulation of Land Registration. This study discusses relative doctrine and practice and makes some propositions in order to achieve the purposes of rights of first refusal properly and to consider the authority and capability of examination of the registry, the efficiency of registration, the activity of transaction, and the interests of the person who has a right of first refusal, the vendor and the third party. In this study, it is suggested that the registry is not required to notify a person of a right of first refusal, but it may give any related person a notification, requiring that he appear to give his opinions. It is not proper that the first paragraph of Article 97 of the Regulation of Land Registration does not require a proof. |