英文摘要 |
There are generally two tendencies characterizing traditional studies of regional history: First, it usually regards the morphology and features of a locality as the products of endogenously social and cultural development, overlooking the possible effects of the flows of people and trade between various places. Second, it views geographical space as a dependent variable to be determined by other factors, underestimating the potentially constructive role of space itself in the development of history. Informed by a rethinking of the epistemology of space in the field of geography in recent years, this study intends to reinterpret Taipei’s regional development in the Qing Dynasty from a perspective that treats the relations between society, space, and time in a more balanced and dialectical fashion. This study holds that Taipei’s regional development in the Qing Dynasty should be looked at simultaneously in terms of three geographical scales, namely, the system of world capitalism, the Qing Empire, and the Taipei Basin itself. From this perspective, this study points out that the spatial structure of the Taipei region was not merely an outcome of local natural or cultural condition, but a social-spatial configuration set by those in power to deal with the political-economic crisis taking place on a greater geographical scale. When a particular social-spatial configuration was not adequate in dealing with a new crisis, it would be reorganized accordingly. Throughout Qing Dynasty, there were four distinct city-town networks that had emerged in the Taipei Basin, i.e. the Frontier of Qing Empire, the Xingzhunag Town-Cluster, the Mongjia Town-Cluster, and the Dadaocheng Town-Cluster, which corresponded respectively to the crisis of coast defense in Southeast China, the crisis of shortage of food provisions in Fujian, the crisis of Taiwan’s internal class conflicts, and the crisis of the overproduction of the world capitalism. |