英文摘要 |
Alan Bullock in his book The Humanist Tradition in the West describes three characteristics of the western humanist tradition. Firstly, it is based on a thought of treating human beings as the center of the cosmos. Secondly, it emphasizes the value of human beings, from which dignity is derived. The third characteristic is that it regards thought as of high importance. Although it puts enormous weight on human beings, starting from the time of Greek, the western humanist tradition expressed itself in the forms of naturalism, objectivism, or pan-theism, none of which is able to serve as the ground of human value. This constitutes the inadequacy of western humanism. Mou Tsung-san argues that it is due to the inability of establishing the subjectivity of human. Mou also claims that the moral subjectivity which is the sole origin of values and ideals has been discovered in ancient Chinese culture. However, humanism as the highest principle of culture includes the recognition of science and the development of democracy, both of which were under-developed in Chinese culture. This paper starts from an examination of the characteristics of humanist tradition in the west by utilizing Bullock's exposition. It goes on introducing Mou Tsung-san's account of the cultural history of the west and its shortcomings. In the later part of the paper, the limit and possible development of western humanism are discussed. In the discussion, the relationship between humanist spirit and moral rationality is the central concern. Finally, it turns back to the issue of how the full-blooded humanism can be established within the context of Chinese culture. |