英文摘要 |
Since most cities in developed countries have been dealing with economic decline of their central civic districts, urban regeneration and revitalization have become integral to contemporary urban planning and development. Since the land use regulation system previously was almost exclusively focused on the living environment, the development control system remains inflexible to market needs. Furthermore, affected by the global economy, governments are also facing fiscal difficulties. For example, local governments are competing for resources from central government to promote urban regeneration. However, the key to solve these fiscal problems is to create new sources of financial support for local government. Such new sources will support the promotion of long-term urban regeneration policy consequently. To overcome the existing institutional barriers and constraints of the administrative system, various “special district” and “special zone” for various local governments have been developed to solve financial problems associated with the implementation of urban regeneration. This paper focuses on TID, BID and Special Structural District, and uses literature review to compare the advantages and disadvantages of these special districts, including Taipei, and to identify the institutional character of different models. Finally, a policy implication is provided by integrating the institutional structure of these special districts for Taiwan to promote future urban regeneration through the special district scheme. |