英文摘要 |
This paper investigates the resultative construction (as in (1)) from an aspectual perspective.(1) The baby cried her throat dry. According to Levin (1993), the resultative phrase in (1) is dry, which describes the state achieved by the referent of the noun phrase (throat) as a result of the action named by the verb (cried). Of great interest to many researchers is the restriction on the types of verbs used in a resultative construction. For instance, Jackendoff (1990) observes that a resultative phrase cannot occur with a “stative” verb believe:(2) *He believed the idea powerful.Another well-known restriction in a resultative construction is the obligatory use of “fake object” as a reflexive when the verb is an intransitive unergative one, such as “talk”. (3) a. He talked himself hoarse.b. *He talked hoarse. The paper offers an aspectual account to explain the above restrictions. I propose that the type of predicate fitted into a resultative construction must entail a bounded event. A bounded event presents a situation where its initial and finalendpoints are closed. Under this view, both (2) and (3a) are ruled-out as a result of failing to provide a bounded predicate, as the stativebelieve the ideaand the activitytalkare unbounded. Following from my proposal, the fake object “himself” appears to alter the predicate from an unbounded to a bounded one. I also argue that this syntactic device is language-specific to English, not applicable to other languages such as Chinese. In other words, (morpho)syntactic devices vary among languages withrespect to how the event can be bounded in a resultative construction. Lastly, the paper provides the detailed discussion of the aspectual meaning and temporal schema of resultative construction. |