英文摘要 |
The traditional agency problem suggests conflicts of interests between managers and shareholders or creditors. However, agency problem in Taiwanese companies is the expropriation from minority shareholders as well as creditors by controlling shareholders (Shleifer and Vishny 1997), which may be due to the deviation of control right and cash flow right. The more extent the divergence is, the weaker the corporate governance is, and the more severe agency problem will be. We examine the relation between corporate governance mechanisms, measured by divergence between control rights and cash flow rights, and earnings management measured by discretionary current accruals, as suggested by Teoh et al. (1998). We find that the more divergence between the control rights diverge form cash flow rights, the more likely the managers engage in earnings management. We also find that firms with independent directors and supervisors and firms whose independent directors and supervisors with financial expertise are more likely to engage in less earnings management, respectively, under the matched-pair sample. This study also compares the internal monitoring power (i.e., board of directors) with the external monitoring power (i.e., external auditor) of constraining earnings management, and examines which monitoring power is stronger in its oversight function. From our matched-pair sample, we also find that the power of constraining earnings management from the board of directors is stronger than that of auditors, which suggests that board of directors may perform the better oversight function than that of auditors. |